THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL-JOACHIM BREKNER, HANSOTTO DROTLOFF, OTTO
HERMANN-SCHONHERR and ARNOLD SCHNELLER
____________
Appeal No. 94-2267
Application No. 07/896,7991
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 15, which are all of the claims in the application.
Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal
and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed June 9, 1992. According to
the appellants the application is a continuation of Application
07/640,997, filed January 14, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007