Ex parte RAJAGOPALAN et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 94-2280                                                                                   
             Application 07/627,175                                                                               


             consideration by the examiner as being directed toward a                                             
             nonelected invention.                                                                                
                                                THE INVENTION                                                     
                    Appellants’ claimed invention is a ligand which is useful                                     
             for forming radionuclide complexes.  Claim 1 is illustrative                                         
             of the subject matter of the invention and is appended to this                                       
             decision.                                                                                            
                                                THE REJECTION                                                     
                    Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under a judicial doctrine                                       
             as being directed to an improper Markush group.                                                      
                                                    OPINION                                                       
                    We have carefully considered all of the arguments                                             
             advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with                                               
             appellants that the aforementioned rejection is not well                                             
             founded.  Accordingly, this rejection will be reversed.                                              
                    The test for whether a Markush group is proper is whether                                     
             all of the compounds in the group have in common a functional                                        
             utility and a substantial structural feature disclosed as                                            
             being essential to that utility.  See In re Harnisch, 631 F.2d                                       
             716, 722, 206 USPQ 300, 305 (CCPA 1980); Ex parte Della Bella,                                       


                                                       -2-2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007