Ex parte COLLINS et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                                    Paper No. 15                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                   Ex parte NICK A. COLLINS                                                                   
                                                    and MOHSEN H. HARANDI                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 94-2410                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/011,5731                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent                                                                   
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from                                                           
                the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 20, which are all                                                               
                the claims in this application.                                                                                               
                         According to appellants, the invention resides in a process                                                          
                for the disproportionation of C -C  paraffins comprising reacting                                                             
                                                                    3   5                                                                     

                         1Application for patent filed February 1, 1993.                                                                      

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007