THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHE-HSIUNG HSU
_____________
Appeal No. 94-2616
Application 07/760,1801
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claim 4 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection. The only other claims remaining in the application,
which are claims 1 and 2, stand withdrawn from further
consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non-elected
1 Application for patent filed September 13, 1991. According to
applicant, the application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/227,785,
filed August 3, 1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007