Ex parte CAMPBELL - Page 2




          Appeal No. 94-3878                                                         
          Application 07/740,529                                                     


          under polymerization conditions with a catalyst comprising                 
          a metal complex corresponding to the formula:                              
                                  +    -                                             
                              L MX  RBY , wherein:m n    3                                              
               L is a delocalized B-bonding group or substituted group               
          containing up to 50 nonhydrogen atoms;                                     
               m is 0 or 1;                                                          
               M is a metal of Group 4 of the Periodic Table;                        
               X each occurrence is an inert, anionic ligand containing              
          up to 20 nonhydrogen atoms;                                                
               n is an integer greater than or equal to 1 and the sum of             
          m and n is one less than the valence of M;                                 
               R is hydrocarbyl, silyl, a combination thereof or a                   
          substituted derivative thereof having up to 20 nonhydrogen atoms;          
               B is boron; and                                                       
               Y is an inert covalently bound group having up to 40 atoms            
          and BY  is a stable borane compound able to abstract an R group            
                3                                                                    
          from a compound of the formula LMX R.                                      
                                          m n                                        

               Claims 1 to 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first            
          paragraph, as being broader than the enabling disclosure.                  
               We will not sustain this rejection.                                   
               An application disclosure which contains a teaching of the            
          manner and process of making and using an invention in terms which         
          correspond in scope to those used in describing and defining the           
          subject matter sought to be patented must be taken in compliance           
          with the enabling requirement of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C.          

                                          2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007