Ex parte TROCCIOLA et al. - Page 1





                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 12              
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                            Ex parte JOHN C. TROCCIOLA,                               
                       CRAIG R. SCHROLL and ROGER R. LESIEUR                          
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 94-4217                                   
                               Application 07/853,6631                                
                                   _______________                                    
                                      On BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 Decision on Appeal                                   
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the decision              
          of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 6, all of                
          the claims in the application.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the              
          claims on appeal:                                                           
          1. A method of reducing to a desired minimum level the                      
          concentration of carbon monoxide in a gaseous medium that also              
          contains at least hydrogen, by selective catalytic oxidation                
          in the presence of gaseous oxygen using a catalyst which is                 
          capable of oxidizing carbon monoxide in an exothermic reaction              
          at temperatures within a given temperature range, but is                    
                                                                                     
          1  Application for patent filed March 19, 1992.                             

                                     - 1 -                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007