THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MASANORI TAKEUCHI, TAKASHI ONISHI, HIROKI IIDA, KAZUSHI SAKAUE, TAKASHI OCHI and SHIRO OHASHI __________ Appeal No. 94-4307 Application 07/919,2671 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-12. We affirm-in-part. The Claimed Subject Matter 1Application for patent filed July 27, 1992. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007