Ex parte VISHWAKARMA et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a                 
               law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                          
                                                                                            Paper No. 23                           
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                              Ex parte LAL C. VISHWAKARMA                                                          
                                                      and CHIN H. CHEN                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 94-4495                                                          
                                                     Application 07/865,1651                                                       
                                                   HEARD: October 17, 1997                                                         
               Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
               WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           

                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final rejection of                   
               claims 1 and 3-15, the only claims remaining in the application.  We reverse.                                       

                       Application for patent filed April 8, 1992.1                                                                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007