THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LAL C. VISHWAKARMA
and CHIN H. CHEN
_____________
Appeal No. 94-4495
Application 07/865,1651
______________
HEARD: October 17, 1997
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
claims 1 and 3-15, the only claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
Application for patent filed April 8, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007