THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANS UHLEMANN, BURKHARD BRAUN,
HEINZ HAUSMANN, GERHARD STOPP,
and HORST KARKOSSA
__________
Appeal No. 95-0140
Application 08/002,5281
__________
HEARD: October 15, 1997
__________
Before Stoner, Chief Administrative Patent Judge , and Calvert
and Meister, Administrative Patent Judges.
Meister, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed January 11, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of application
07/484,708, filed February 26, 1990, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of application 07/224,524, filed July 26,1988, now
Patent No. 4,946,654, issued August 7, 1990; which is a
continuation of application 06/718,129, filed April 1, 1985, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007