Paper No. 22
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte BRUCE MULHOLLAND
______________
Appeal No. 95-0244
Application 08/035,8321
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, SOFOCLEOUS and WARREN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
RONALD H. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
3, 5, 7-10, 12, 14 and 16-22. Claims 2, 4, 6, 11, 13 and 15
have been canceled, and claims 23 and 24 have been allowed.
Application for patent filed March 23, 1993. According to applicant,1
this application is a continuation of 07/812,594, filed December 23, 1991,
now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007