Appeal No. 95-0277
Application 08/002,563
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JOHN R. SANDERSON
and JOHN F. KNIFTON
______________
Appeal No. 95-0277
Application 08/002,5631
_______________
On BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the decision of
the examiner finally rejecting claims 6, 7 and 9. Claim 9 was
1Application for patent filed January 11, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
application for patent 07/833,200, filed February 10, 1992, now
abandoned.
- 1
-
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007