THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEAN GUEVEL, MARC FRANCOIS and GUY CONTEMPS
____________
Appeal No. 95-0429
Application No. 07/730,1991
____________
HEARD: December 10, 1997
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 6 and 8. Claim 7 stands withdrawn from
further consideration by the examiner as being drawn to a
nonelected invention.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal
and is reproduced below:
1Application for patent filed July 15, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007