THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte LOUIS BURJES
and CALVIN W. SCHROECK
______________
Appeal No. 95-0460
Application 07/962,3821
_______________
On BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the decision
of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 12 and 37-
44. Claims 13 through 36 are also of record and have been
withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as directed to a
nonelected invention.
The appealed claims as represented by claims 1 and 37 are
drawn to compounds and compositions wherein the compounds
contain two to about four phenol moieties bridged to each
1 Application for patent filed October 16, 1992.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007