Appeal No. 95-0953
Application 07/976,328
The meaning of "within" does not appear broad enough to
encompass structure mounted within a wall without undue
straining; for example, it is not clear that a doorway opening
to a room is "within" the room. Therefore, the rejection of
claims 1-4, 6-13, and 15-17 over Pfeiffer is reversed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1, 9, and 17 over Dufresne is
sustained and the rejection of claims 2, 3, and 10-12 over
Dufresne is reversed.
The rejection of 1-4, 6-13, and 15-17 over Pfeiffer is
reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
- 13 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007