THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KOJI MATSUDA and MIWAKO KITAO
________________
Appeal No. 95-0969
Application 07/045,5861
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1, 3, 5-7, 10 and 11 as amended after final rejection.
These are all of the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 16, 1992.
According the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/618,845, filed November 28, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007