Ex parte KOJI MATSUDA et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                           Paper No. 19                                       

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                       Ex parte KOJI MATSUDA and MIWAKO KITAO                                                                 
                                                        Appeal No. 95-0969                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/045,5861                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent                                                                 
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                           

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow                                                               
                claims 1, 3, 5-7, 10 and 11 as amended after final rejection.                                                                 
                These are all of the claims remaining in the application.                                                                     

                         1Application for patent filed September 16, 1992.                                                                    
                According the appellants, the application is a continuation of                                                                
                Application 07/618,845, filed November 28, 1990, now abandoned.                                                               

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007