Ex parte ROSENBERGER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                       Paper No. 14                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte MARY E. ROSENBERGER and DONALD B. JONES                    
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 95-1092                                   
                               Application 08/044,4361                                
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before GARRIS, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from                
          the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-9.  The remaining                
          claim in the case, claim 10, has been withdrawn from                        




               Application for patent filed April 8, 1993.1                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007