Paper No. 24 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte KLAUS-DIETER HAMMER AND HERMANN WINTER ______________ Appeal No. 95-1167 Application 07/928,027 1 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before RONALD SMITH, SOFOCLEOUS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge . DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal was originally taken from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 19. Subsequent to the final rejection, the examiner entered appellants' amendment canceling claim 3. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as to claim 3, leaving for Application for patent filed August 11, 1992.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007