Appeal No. 95-1545 Application 07/842,329 Claims 8-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Battaglia in view of Zick or Cosentino, Afromowitz and/or Boeke or Fjeldly. Opinion We have carefully considered the respective positions advanced by appellants and the examiner. For the reasons set forth below, we will not sustain either of the examiner's rejections. The claims on appeal require that there be a gradient of metallic particles and metal salt particles in the non- conductive matrix such that “the surface of the electrode predominantly comprises metal salt particles, whereby the ratio of metallic particles to insoluble metal salt particles gradually increases from the outermost towards the innermost portions of the non-conductive matrix layer.” According to appellants’ disclosure, this is accomplished by treating the surface of the matrix layer which is treated to convert the metal particles to metal halide particles (specification, page 5, lines 19-29). Although Fig. 1 of Battaglia shows an Ag- AgCl ion-selective electrode having sequential continuous layers of Ag and AgCl on a non-conductive substrate (see also 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007