THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD SWISHER, JAMES A. PHIPPS,
DOUGLAS R. PELLEYMOUNTER AND JAMES L. GRIESER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1632 1
Application 07/991,658
_____________
ON BRIEF
_____________
Before WINTERS, CAROFF and KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 5-7, all the claims remaining in the application.
1According to appellants, application for patent was filed
December 16, 1992, which is a continuation of application
07/679,255, issued April 2, 1991, now abandoned, which is a
continuation-in-part of application 07/506,720, issued April
10, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007