Ex parte SWISHER et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                
                was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not                                                               
                binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                               
                                                                                                    Paper No. 15                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                   Ex parte RICHARD SWISHER, JAMES A. PHIPPS,                                                                 
                                DOUGLAS R. PELLEYMOUNTER AND JAMES L. GRIESER                                                                 
                                                      Appeal No. 95-1632 1                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/991,658                                                                    
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                Before WINTERS, CAROFF and KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
                CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          
                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                                                             
                claims 5-7, all the claims remaining in the application.                                                                      

                         1According to appellants, application for patent was filed                                                           
                December 16, 1992, which is a continuation of application                                                                     
                07/679,255, issued April 2, 1991, now abandoned, which is a                                                                   
                continuation-in-part of application 07/506,720, issued April                                                                  
                10, 1990, now abandoned.                                                                                                      


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007