Ex parte FURUYA et al. - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 21                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                             Ex parte YOSHIYUKI FURUYA,                               
                                 KUNIMITSU AOKI AND                                   
                                    TADASHI IINO                                      
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 95-1947                                   
                              Application 07/787,4471                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and TORCZON, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s              
          final rejection of claims 1 and 2, which constitute all the                 
          claims in the application.                                                  



               Application for patent filed November 4, 1991.1                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007