THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FRANK J. TRAVER and DUANE F. MERRILL
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2270
Application 08/005,8561
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: GRON, Administrative Patent Judge, and
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
1 Application for patent filed January 15, 1993. Applicants claim the
benefit (35 U.S.C. § 120) of the filing date of application 07/850,711, filed
March 13, 1992, and application 07/265,192, filed October 31, 1988, now U.S.
Patent Nš 5,128,394 issued July 7, 1992. The real party in interest is General
Electric Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007