THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT E. JEHLE
____________
Appeal No. 95-2533
Application No. 08/018,1251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SCHAFER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
MEISTER and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Robert E. Jehle (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 12, 15 and 16. Claims 6-9 and 13, 2
the only other claims remaining in the application, stand
allowed. We affirm.
By way of background, the instant application was the
subject of a prior appeal wherein this merits panel of the Board
1Application for patent filed February 16, 1993.
2Claim 4 has been amended subsequent to final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007