Ex parte MARGIT NAGY et al. - Page 1

                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                            
                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                            
                        today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                              
                        journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                          
                                                                                                    Paper No. 18                        

                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                             Ex parte MARGIT NAGY, LIDIA FEDINA, RITA BALAZS,                                                           
                    BORBALA BARTA, GIZELLA TOTH, JUDIT MARCZIS and ANDRAS SZASZ                                                         
                                                     Appeal No. 95-2924                                                                 
                                                 Application 08/061,3561                                                                
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                   
                Before KIMLIN, ELLIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                    

                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                 
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9,                                                       
                all the claims in the present application.  Claim 1 is                                                                  
                        1.  An aerosol preparation comprising 1 to 4% by mass of                                                        
                sodium cromoglycate suspended in a mixture of propellants                                                               
                containing 0.3 to 2.0% by mass of a dispersing agent consisting                                                         
                of oleyl oleate.                                                                                                        

                        1Application for patent filed May 14, 1993.  According to                                                       
                appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of                                                               
                Application 07/789,196, filed November 8, 1991, now abandoned.                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007