THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte HIROSHI GOTO
Appeal No. 95-2948
Application 07/833,6641
HEARD: July 17, 1997
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
Application for patent filed February 11, 1992, entitled "Optical Scanner And Bar Code1
Reader Employing Same," which claims the priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Japanese
Application 03-41341, filed February 12, 1991, Japanese Application 03-138307, filed
May 13, 1991, and Japanese Application 03-298235, filed October 16, 1991.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007