Ex parte AUBER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not             
          binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                       Paper No. 14                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                           Ex parte ROLAND J. AUBER and                              
                                  JOSEPH M. MOSLEY                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 95-3158                                   
                               Application 08/038,4241                                
               ____________                                                           
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the            
          examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 4-7.  No claim has               
          been allowed.  Claims 1 and 6 are independent claims.  Claim 4              
          depends from claim 1.  Claim 5 depends from claim 4.  Claim 7               
          depends from claim 6.                                                       
                         Reference Relied on by the Examiner                          
          Aoki           U.S. Patent No. 5,078,019          Jan. 7, 1992              


            Application for patent filed March 29, 1993.                              

                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007