THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROLAND J. AUBER and
JOSEPH M. MOSLEY
____________
Appeal No. 95-3158
Application 08/038,4241
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 4-7. No claim has
been allowed. Claims 1 and 6 are independent claims. Claim 4
depends from claim 1. Claim 5 depends from claim 4. Claim 7
depends from claim 6.
Reference Relied on by the Examiner
Aoki U.S. Patent No. 5,078,019 Jan. 7, 1992
Application for patent filed March 29, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007