Ex parte JACQUELINE M. DEANE - Page 1

                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                           
                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                          
                   (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                            
                   (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                          
                                                                                                Paper No. 23                           

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                             Ex parte JACQUELINE M. DEANE                                                              
                                                     Appeal No. 95-3282                                                                
                                                Application  07/758,1491                                                               
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                  
                   Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
                   KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 
                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                           This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6, all of the                     
                   claims pending in the application.  The examiner now holds claim 4 to be directed to                                
                   allowable subject matter, the claim being merely objected to.   Accordingly,  there is no                           
                   longer a rejection of claim 4 before us on appeal.                                                                  
                           The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for image enhancement.                                  
                   Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                        

                   1   Application for patent filed September 12, 1991.                                                                

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007