THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KENICHI AKABORI, HIROSHI OGAWA,
KATSUHIRO SHIOBARA, and YUUJI AOYAGI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3351
Application 07/735,3561
______________
HEARD: September 15, 1997
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-
13, 16-31, and 33-41. Claims 14 and 15 were withdrawn as
directed to a nonelected species and Claim 32 was canceled.
We affirm in part.
1Application for patent filed July 24, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007