Appeal No. 95-3362
Application 08/009,200
1087, 37 USPQ2d at 1239, citing W. L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v.
Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d at 1551, 1553, 220 USPQ at 311, 312-13.
Upon reviewing Aasen, we fail to find any suggested desirability
of modifying the Aasen system as recited in Appellant’s claims 1
through 8.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 8
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is
reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS
) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007