Appeal No. 95-3411
Application 08/040,960
at least one speaker operatively connected to
said processing means for providing audio
perception of cooking information accessed by
said processing means;
input means operatively connected to said
processing means for instructing said
processing means regarding types of cooking
information to be accessed; and
said at least one memory library comprising
an audio library memory means connected to
said processing means, said audio library
memory means being accessible by said
processing means to supply cooking
information in audio form.
Opinion
We do not sustain the rejection of claims 4-8 as being
indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
We also do not sustain the rejection of claims 4-8 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bado and well known
cookbooks.
The rejection of claims 4-8 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph
The test for compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, is:
[W]hether the claim language, when read by a person of
ordinary skill in the art in light of the
specification, describes the subject matter with
sufficient precision that the bounds of the claimed
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007