THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL D. RECHTIN
__________
Appeal No. 95-3421
Application 08/045,3231
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9 to
18, 20 and 21 . Claims 1 to 8, the other claims remaining in2
1Application for patent filed April 7, 1993.
2We note that although appellant cancelled claim 19 in
the Amendment Under Rule 116 filed July 29, 1994 (Paper No.
(continued...)
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007