Appeal No. 95-3630
Application No. 08/001,993
One additional comment is in order. We note that the
expression “0.1 to 3 parts of titanium dioxide” in claim 24 is
somewhat vague in that it is not related to the amount of any
other composition component as, for example, in claim 26 and in
the specification (p. 7, line 27 - p. 8, line 3). We find it
unnecessary to reject the claims under 35 USC 112, second
paragraph, for indefiniteness by applying the provisions of 37
CFR 1.196(b) since we trust that the examiner and appellant will
engage in a cooperative effort to obviate this problem.
REVERSED
)
MARC L. CAROFF )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JOAN ELLIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007