Appeal No. 95-3940
Application 08/206,022
The following reference is relied on by the
examiner:
Kolmes et al. (Kolmes) 4,838,017 June 13,
1989
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 54, 55, 58, 60 and 61 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kolmes.
The appellants have indicated that all the claims
stand or fall together (Brief at page 4).
Rather than reiterate the entire arguments of the
appellants and the examiner in support of their respective
positions, reference is made to appellants' brief (Paper No.
10) and reply brief (Paper No. 12), and the examiner's answer
(Paper No. 11) for the full exposition thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our conclusions on the issues raised in
this appeal, we have carefully considered appellants'
specification and claims, the applied reference, and the
respective viewpoints advanced by the appellants and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we have made the
determination that the rejection of claims 54, 55, 58, 60 and
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007