THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CRAIG S. SLAVTCHEFF
__________
Appeal No. 95-3981
Application 08/099,8801
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and WINTERS and WILLIAM F.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5,
7, and 8. Subsequently, the examiner withdrew the rejection of claims 4 and 5
indicating that these claims would be allowable if placed in independent form. This
leaves claims 1, 7, and 8 for our consideration.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed July 30, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007