THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN D. JENSEN
____________
Appeal No. 95-4113
Application No. 08/124,3341
____________
HEARD: December 9, 1997
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 21, 22, 23 and 26
through 29. Claims 17, 19, 20, 30, 31 and 32 have been allowed.
Claims 3, 12 and 25 have been objected to as depending from a non
allowed claim. Claims 2, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18 and 24 have
been canceled.
1Application for patent filed September 20, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007