Ex parte FARRINGTON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-4135                                                          
          Application 07/772,998                                                      


          said circuit breakers includes means for interrupting and                   
          establishing an associated current path and includes decoding               
          means for decoding its designated coded signal and returning a              
          response signal;                                                            
                    a data communication bus, arranged adjacent the                   
          plurality of circuit breakers and within the distribution panel,            
          for carrying coded signals to and from the associated circuit               
          breaker’s decoding means; and                                               
                    a plurality of coupling means, each of said coupling              
          means located within the distribution panel and physically                  
          connected to the data communication bus and an associated circuit           
          breaker and arranged for coupling the associated circuit                    
          breaker’s decoding means to the data communication bus.                     
                    The references relied on by the examiner are:                     
          Geyer et al. (Geyer)              3,842,249        Oct. 15, 1974            
          Breimesser et al. (Breimesser)    4,175,238        Nov. 20, 1979            
          Borona                            4,308,511        Dec. 29, 1981            
          Wilson et al. (Wilson)            4,338,647        July  6, 1982            
          Miller et al. (Miller)            4,535,332        Aug. 13, 1985            
          Brifman et al. (Brifman)          4,556,882        Dec.  3, 1985            
          Hedman et al. (Hedman)            4,819,180        Apr.  4, 1989            
          Brodsky et al. (Brodsky)          4,918,566        Apr. 17, 1990            
                    Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being unpatentable over Borona, Brifman, Geyer, Brodsky,                 
          Breimesser, Miller and Hedman.                                              
                    Claims 7 through 9, 11 through 17 and 21 stand rejected           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the references             
          applied to claims 1 through 6 in further view of Wilson.                    
                    Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    
                                       OPINION                                        
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007