Ex parte REINEHR et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                        Paper No. 28                          

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                               Ex parte PAUL-WERNER REINEHR, GUNTER DIETERICH,                                                                
                            HANS-WERNER SCHULTE, KARLHEINZ PIEL and DIRK FENGER                                                               
                                                        Appeal No. 95-4269                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/123,7001                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                Before CALVERT, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 11 to                                                           
                18 and 24 to 26, all the claims remaining in the application.                                                                 
                         Claim 24 is illustrative of the subject matter in issue:                                                             
                         24.  A grating system with parallel strips of structural                                                             
                section forming air channels for an armored special-purpose                                                                   
                vehicle, comprising:  a movable frame for holding said strips;                                                                
                means for mounting said frame on said vehicle; and movable energy                                                             

                         1Application for patent filed September 17, 1993.                                                                    
                According to appellants, this application is a continuation of                                                                
                Application 07/887,687, filed May 22, 1992, now abandoned.                                                                    

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007