Appeal No. 95-4372
Application No. 08/043,610
Yamamoto et al. (Japan) 63-300699 2 Dec. 7, 1988
Claims 16 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated by Tominari. In a new ground of rejection entered in the
principal answer, the examiner also rejects claims 16 and 17 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Tominari and Kendall. Claims 23
through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
Kondrat'ev in view of Tominari. Claims 19, 21 and 22 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kondrat'ev and Tominari in
view of Yamamoto.
Reference is made to the briefs and answers for the
respective positions of appellants and the examiner.
OPINION
We turn first to the rejection of claims 16 and 17 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Tominari.
Trademark Office. A copy of said translation is included herewith.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007