Appeal No. 95-4414
Application 08/143,007
device as argued by the examiner, then the reference image, which
is defined as the image before compression, is never fed to
Bovik’s microprocessor for separate processing. Regardless of
where one considers the processing to take place in Bovik, there
is no calculation of the claimed values for both a reference
image and a processed image. Since all the claims on appeal
recite this form of parallel processing of two images, there is
no way that Bovik can reasonably suggest the invention as
claimed.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 5 and 14
is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007