Appeal No. 95-4595
Application 07/927,783
Claims 12 through 15, 26, and 27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Tomita in view of
Teragaki.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper
No. 26), while the complete statement of appellant's argument can
be found in the brief (Paper No. 25).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the obviousness issue raised
in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered
appellant's specification and claims, the applied references, and
the respective viewpoints of appellant and the examiner. As a
consequence of our review, we make the determination which
follows.
We cannot sustain the examiner's rejection of appellant's
claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for the reasons articulated, infra.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007