Ex parte VOISIN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-4673                                                          
          Application 08/097,759                                                      


          The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                     
          rejections of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                
          Haney, Jr. (Haney)         2,753,094          July  3, 1956                 
          Kesterson               Des. 276,760          Dec. 18, 1984                 
          Hayes                      4,527,720          July  9, 1985                 
          Claims 10 through 12 and 14 stand rejected under 35                         
          U.S.C.    § 103 as being unpatentable over Hayes in view of                 
          Kesterson.                                                                  
          Claims 14 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                   
          as being unpatentable over Hayes in view of Kesterson as                    
          applied to claim 10 above, and further in view of Haney.                    
          Rather than reiterate the examiner's explanation of the                     
          above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and appellant regarding those rejections, we                
          make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 13, mailed               
          April 21, 1995) for the examiner's full reasoning in support                
          of the rejections, and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 12,                  
          filed March 13, 1995) for appellant's arguments thereagainst.               







                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007