THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD P. KOZEK and ROBERT M. JOHNSTONE
____________
Appeal No. 95-4678
Application 08/097,5721
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, LYDDANE, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1 through
9, 14 through 22 and 28 through 31. Claims 10 through 13 and 23
through 27, the only other claims pending in the application,
stand allowed.
1Application for patent filed July 26, 1993. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/591,719, filed October 2, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007