THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD J. BALCAREK, ROBERT L. BARTOSH,
ROBERT P. BISHOP, BRYAN J. DAGUE, DOUGLAS B. STROTT,
JOHN M. ARMACOST and STEVEN BERINGHAUSE
____________
Appeal No. 95-4738
Application No. 08/146,8681
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LYDDANE, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4 through 13, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed November 2, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007