Ex parte HAMMOND et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4826                                                           
          Application 08/141,752                                                       


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 14 and             
          16.  Claims 9, 11-13 and 15 stand allowed, and claims 1-8 and 10             
          have been cancelled.                                                         
               The subject matter relates to compounds useful as water                 
          soluble laser dyes.  Copies of appealed claims 14 and 16 are                 
          attached in the appendix to this decision.                                   
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                           
          Austin et al. (Austin)              3,956,300      May  11, 1976             
          Friedrich et al. (Friedrich)        4,256,882      Mar. 17, 1981             
               Claims 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
          unpatentable over Austin.  Further, claims 14 and 16 stand                   
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Friedrich.               
          We have carefully considered the entire record, including                    
          appellants' position as set forth in their briefs, and the                   
          examiner's position, as set in his answers, and we have decided              
          that we will affirm the examiner's rejections.  Since we are in              
          substantial agreement with the examiner's position as set forth              
          in his answers, we adopt his position as our own.                            
               As noted by the examiner, Austin discloses xanthene                     
          dyestuffs (column 1, lines 4-65) of formula (1), in which R  and2                
           3           1     4                                                        
          R  may be H, R  and R  may be sulphoethyl, and phenyl ring A may             
          be substituted by a sulfonic acid group.  The dyestuffs thus                 
          disclosed by Austin differ from the dyes set forth in claim 14 in            
                                           2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007