Appeal No. 95-4826 Application 08/141,752 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 14 and 16. Claims 9, 11-13 and 15 stand allowed, and claims 1-8 and 10 have been cancelled. The subject matter relates to compounds useful as water soluble laser dyes. Copies of appealed claims 14 and 16 are attached in the appendix to this decision. The references relied on by the examiner are: Austin et al. (Austin) 3,956,300 May 11, 1976 Friedrich et al. (Friedrich) 4,256,882 Mar. 17, 1981 Claims 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Austin. Further, claims 14 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Friedrich. We have carefully considered the entire record, including appellants' position as set forth in their briefs, and the examiner's position, as set in his answers, and we have decided that we will affirm the examiner's rejections. Since we are in substantial agreement with the examiner's position as set forth in his answers, we adopt his position as our own. As noted by the examiner, Austin discloses xanthene dyestuffs (column 1, lines 4-65) of formula (1), in which R and2 3 1 4 R may be H, R and R may be sulphoethyl, and phenyl ring A may be substituted by a sulfonic acid group. The dyestuffs thus disclosed by Austin differ from the dyes set forth in claim 14 in 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007