THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSE F. DOMINGUEZ
____________
Appeal No. 95-4860
Application No. 08/044,9231
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
MEISTER and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Jose F. Dominguez (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 12-22, the only claims remaining in the
application. We reverse and, pursuant to our authority under
1Application for patent filed April 8, 1993. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/770,565, filed October 3, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007