THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANTHONY C. SHUCOSKY and WILLIAM P. SEELEY
____________
Appeal No. 95-4865
Application No. 08/240,5051
____________
HEARD: June 09, 1997
____________
Before LYDDANE, MEISTER, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Anthony C. Shucosky and William P. Seeley (the appellants)
appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-5, the only claims
present in the application. We reverse.
The appellants’ invention pertains to a pleated filter
cartridge having a poly(tetra-fluoro ethylene), i.e., PTFE,
1Application for patent filed May 10, 1994. According to
appellants this application, is a continuation of Application
07/883,122, filed May 14, 1992, which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/792,621, filed November 15, 1991, both
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007