THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSEPH L. ROSS JR. and CHARLES SCHAUB
__________
Appeal No. 96-0037
Application 08/237,2241
__________
HEARD: Oct. 14, 1997
__________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 15 through 27, which constitute all of the
claims remaining of record in the application.
1Application for patent filed May 2, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
08/041,721 filed April 1, 1993, now abandoned; which is a
division of Application 07/756,479 filed September 9, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007