THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN R. SCHOESSOW
____________
Appeal No. 96-0079
Application No. 08/114,3911
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LYDDANE, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection
of claims 1, 4 and 5. Subsequent to the final rejection, claims
2 through 4 were amended, resulting in the allowance of claims 2
and 3, the withdrawal of the 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph,
1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007