Ex parte SCHOESSOW - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 15                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                 Ex parte JOHN R. SCHOESSOW                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 96-0079                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/114,3911                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before LYDDANE, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent                                                                    
                Judges.                                                                                                                       
                NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            



                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection                                                           
                of claims 1, 4 and 5.  Subsequent to the final rejection, claims                                                              
                2 through 4 were amended, resulting in the allowance of claims 2                                                              
                and 3, the withdrawal of the 35 U.S.C.  112, second paragraph,                                                               



                         1Application for patent filed August 31, 1993.                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007