Ex parte NAKAMARU et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 96-0209                                                          
          Application 07/922,501                                                      

          delay means for delaying the reproduced music signal in                     
          accordance with a clock signal from the control information                 
          reproduction means.  Independent claim 8 requires a controllable            
          storage means for storing the reproduced music signal in                    
          accordance with a clock signal from the control information                 
          reproduction means.                                                         
               The appellants' specification, however, describes no                   
          embodiment in which the reproduced music signal, i.e., an output            
          of the audio data decode circuit 24, is stored anywhere or                  
          otherwise delayed.  According to the specification, that which is           
          stored or delayed is the output of RF System Amplifier 21 (see              
          Figures 4A and 4B), which is not the music signal from the music            
          information reproduction means.                                             
               "Failure to describe adequately the necessary, structure,              
          material, or acts in the written description means that the                 
          drafter [of claims] has failed to comply with the mandate of                
          § 112 ¶ 2  -- (2)(a) in the model above -- the mandate that all             
          claims must particularly point out and distinctly claim the                 
          subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention."               
          In re Dossel, 115 F.3d 942, 42 USPQ2d at 1881-1884 (Fed. Cir.               
          1997).  In Dossel, 115 F.3d, 942, 42 USPQ2d at 1884-1885, quoting           
          In re Donaldson, 16 F.3d 1189, 29 USPQ2d 1845 (Fed. Cir. 1994),             


                                         -17-                                         





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007