THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ANDREW E. McGIRR,
PAUL L. CAMWELL
and
JOHN G. McRORY
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0365
Application 07/983,1451
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRETT, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 30, 1992.
According to applicants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/725,213, filed June 25, 1991, which is a
continuation of Application 07/339,573, filed April 18, 1989.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007