THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PHILIPPE EHRET, CHRISTOPHE ROUGEOT,
HERVE BROCHARD and ANDRE STAMM
________________
Appeal No. 96-0393
Application 07/955,2581
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges, and McKelvey, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting
claims 1 through 4, 6 and 7, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on
appeal, reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed October 1, 1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007