Ex parte EHRET - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                        Paper No. 18                          

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                  Ex parte PHILIPPE EHRET, CHRISTOPHE ROUGEOT,                                                                
                                             HERVE BROCHARD and ANDRE STAMM                                                                   
                                                        Appeal No. 96-0393                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/955,2581                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                                                    
                Judges, and McKelvey, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
                WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting                                                         
                claims 1 through 4, 6 and 7, which are all of the claims                                                                      
                remaining in the application.                                                                                                 
                         Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on                                                              
                appeal, reads as follows:                                                                                                     

                         1Application for patent filed October 1, 1992.                                                                       

Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007